Personalization in Marketing is not Personal At All

We have an issue with how “personalization” in marketing is defined.

Most marketers agree that personalization of the customer experience is extremely important. However, we think that the definition of personalization in the industry has taken a dark turn into – frankly – creepy levels of automated digital stalking.

Many of us have stories about how we say something into the ether and minutes later an ad pops up on our feeds about that exact product/service. That’s not by accident, and somewhere someone in digital marketing is patting themselves on the back for that “personalization”. When something like that happens, it feels anything but personal. It often feels the opposite.

What personalization in our industry truly needs to be is completely different, and a lot less intrusive. Personalization should mean understanding historical contexts, embracing cultural nuances, and relatable stories where audiences can find themselves truly seen – often for the first time.

That is true personalization, and it doesn’t require digital stalking – it requires embracing lived experiences and an inclusive mindset.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on tumblr
Share on email
Share on print


How inclusive is your brand?

Adapted from Dr. Bennett’s Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, our self-assessment tool can help you learn how inclusive your brand is, as well as next steps and tips to improve.

Have a specific question? Ask us today.


Stay in-the-know about what’s happening at AndHumanity.


Treat others as they would want to be treated. We promise to only send you content that is relevant to marketing, diversity and inclusion. 

Where do you land on the Brand Inclusion Curve? Get tips and insights.